BACK TO NEWS

The BID Printed a Leaflet Called 'A Stronger District for Artists'. Every Picture of Art in It Is Fake.

The Las Vegas Arts District BID leaflet A Stronger District for Artists, illustrated with AI generated murals

The Las Vegas Arts District BID printed a leaflet for artists. It is headed "A Stronger District for Artists," and under that, "How the BID supports artists and the creative sector." Six numbered panels, six photographs of art in the neighborhood, one paragraph each about how the BID will look after the people who made it.

Every photograph in it is machine generated. Not one of the murals in a leaflet about supporting muralists is a real picture of a real wall.

The Las Vegas Arts District BID leaflet titled A Stronger District for Artists, with six panels of AI generated photographs
The leaflet, photographed by Recycled Propaganda.

Panel 03

The third panel is headed "Support for creative businesses and spaces." The text underneath talks about activating vacant space and helping retain the unique character of the district. The picture above it is the wall at 1212 South Main.

That wall belongs to a piece called Purging Progress by Izaac Zevalking, who paints as Recycled Propaganda. An astronaut doubled over, throwing up a bundle of charging cables and connectors. He painted it this year because he was tired of technology crawling into everything.

In the leaflet the figure has no head. No helmet, no face plate, nothing coming out of it. What is left is a heap of white and blue tubes folded over on a red wall, closer to a pile of bones than a person. The cables, which are the entire argument the painting makes, are gone.

Three versions of the Purging Progress mural: the real wall at 1212 South Main, the BID leaflet version, and a different AI render on the BID website
The wall, and two different machine versions of it.

The third frame there is not a crop of the second one. It is a separate render, which sat on the BID's homepage until this week, produced from the same wall with a different result. There the helmet has become a snout with an eye set into it, and the cables have turned into one thin drip. Two passes, two different failures. Somebody kept feeding it back in.

Zevalking posted the comparison himself.

His words: "Check out how they 'improved' our murals with AI. If you wanted to see what the B.I.D. Vision for the arts district was, here it is! Can anyone even guess what it's supposed to be?" Then two hashtags, #nobid and #noai.

The same post on Instagram

He is not a bystander. His gallery is at 1114 South Main, a few doors from the mural and inside the proposed BID boundary, which makes him one of the people who would be paying for this. Las Vegas Weekly named it Best Art Gallery in 2025 and it represents more than forty local artists. He sits on the board of 18b, the nonprofit that has carried the Arts District name for twenty years. His work is in Omega Mart, in the Cosmopolitan, in the Resorts World poker room.

Pay to park

There is a parking sign bolted to that wall. In life it reads PAY TO PARK, ENFORCED 24 HOURS DAILY, with a second plate reading Pay In Advance.

The real PAY TO PARK sign on the mural wall next to the AI version which reads RAY TO PAHK above blocks of gibberish
Left, the sign. Right, the website's attempt at it.

Nobody checked. It went up anyway.

It is not one bad picture

Look at the leaflet's own header. That is the Greetings from Las Vegas postcard wall, and next to it the Vegas Strong panel, the one dated 1 October 2017. In the leaflet the lettering has come apart and the memorial has been reduced to a blue smear with a phantom bicycle parked in front of it.

Panel 05, "A stronger voice at the table," shows a painted fence where the right third of the image dissolves into black and white noise. Panel 02 has lettering that is not letters. Panel 04 is the turntable mural with hands that do not resolve.

Details from the BID leaflet showing the garbled Vegas Strong memorial mural in the header and a panel dissolving into visual noise
Two details from the same page.

Then there is the website, which tells you how the sausage is made. Until this week, pulling the page source on lvartsdistrictbid.com showed the images being served under their original upload names. The homepage graphic was called ChatGPT Image Sep 21, 2026 at 10_08_18 AM.png. The "Why a BID" page was running ChatGPT Image Sep 1, 2026 at 11_27_49 AM.png. The costs page was running ChatGPT Image Sep 1, 2026 at 10_34_46 AM.png. Three weeks of it, sitting there in plain text.

Open the Top Priorities graphic and every photograph in it is synthetic too. A worker in a hi-vis vest cleaning up in front of a mural that has never existed. A patio crowd. A street of shopfronts. A wall painted LOVE LAS VEGAS that is not the real one. Five pictures of the Arts District, none of them the Arts District.

The Our Top Priorities graphic on the BID website, in which all five photographs are AI generated
Five photographs. Zero of them real.

They are asking a neighborhood full of working photographers, painters and muralists for two million dollars a year, and they could not be bothered to hire one of them to take a picture.

Then they took it down

Between 22 and 25 September, all three of those files came off the site.

The "What is a BID?" graphic, the one carrying the mural, is gone from the homepage entirely. The Top Priorities graphic is still there, with the same five headings and the same text, except the five generated photographs have been deleted and the file is now called Our BID Priorities.png. The costs page images have been renamed too, to BID Budget.png and How will BID funds be spent.png.

The BID Top Priorities graphic before and after, showing five AI generated photographs removed and the file renamed
Same page, three days apart.

No statement. No correction. The media page still lists the same two friendly news stories and nothing else. The petition is still running.

The original files are all still sitting on their content server at the old addresses, unlinked from any page but serving fine. We archived them before the scrub, which is why you are looking at them.

What a BID actually is

Strip the branding off and a Business Improvement District is a tax you vote on with property, not with people.

Nevada does this under Chapter 271 of the state statutes, filed as a Neighborhood Improvement Project. The proposed district runs from Bonneville Avenue down to Wyoming, railroad tracks on the west, the Las Vegas Boulevard parcels on the east. Commercial, apartment, nonprofit and government owners inside that box would pay 6.5 mills, which is $6.50 for every $1,000 of assessed value. Residential condo owners pay half. Vacant commercial land pays 12.025 mills, close to double the developed rate.

To force a council hearing, the organizers need signatures from owners holding at least 50 percent of the total assessed value in the district. Not 50 percent of owners. Fifty percent of the money. If you own a lot, your signature weighs more than the signature of the woman running a shop out of one storefront. Once it passes the term is ten years, and in year nine the board can ask the council to extend it without ever running another petition.

That is what the group calling itself Don't BID Us Out is fighting. Their argument is the one Wynwood and Downtown LA already ran: the services arrive, the assessment gets passed through in rent, and the small operators who made the neighborhood worth assessing are gone in five years. Karina Carancho, who runs Plur City, told Fox5 she expects to be charged higher rent. She said she is afraid of ending up with a Starbucks next door.

Follow the budget

The BID published its own numbers, so we can skip the arguing.

The BID's year one operating budget showing 35 percent to security and 20 percent to marketing
Their own year one breakdown.

Year one comes to $1,932,430.53.

  • Security and safety: 35 percent, $623,850.68
  • Marketing and activation: 20 percent, $406,486.11
  • Administration: 15 percent, $267,364.58
  • Placemaking and public realm: 10 percent, $228,243.05
  • Cleaning and maintenance: 10 percent, $178,243.05
  • Business support: 7.5 percent, $183,682.29
  • Reserves: 2.5 percent, $44,560.76

Private security gets three and a half times the cleaning budget. Marketing gets more than double it. Running the office costs half again what it costs to pick up the trash.

Art does not have a line. In a district named after it, murals appear once, as a single bullet inside the 10 percent placemaking bucket, sharing that money with trees, banners, holiday decor and wayfinding signs. The management plan commits to "ongoing graffiti abatement" in a neighborhood that exists because people painted on walls they did not own.

One more number. The plan caps any single parcel at $5 million of assessed value, and anything above that line is not assessed at all. The largest holdings, the ones belonging to the developers running the petition, stop paying past the cap. The corner shop pays on every dollar it has.

Who decides

The management plan says the board should "ideally" include at least one artist who is a tenant, owner or resident of the district.

The initial board has ten voting seats. Sam Cherry of shareDOWNTOWN, who is leading the petition. Gary Creagh Jr of Sticky LLC. Adam Foulad of KLA Capital. Alex Woodin of Southern Land. Weina Zhang of Z Life. Christina Dylag of Velveteen Rabbit. Derek Stonebarger of ReBAR. Jen Taler of Akin Cooperative. Sean Blanchard of The Good Wolf. Andrew Kjellman of the RTC.

Property owners and business owners. No artist. The board is also self-appointing, so those ten choose everybody who comes after them.

The non-voting seats include Sheriff Kevin McMahill, Marshals Chief Jason Potts, five city officials and the chair of 18b. The Metropolitan Police Department has a chair at the table of the Arts District BID before a single painter does.

None of this is new here

Earlier this year a mural by Xavi Panneton, his first big piece after losing his house and workshop in an Oregon wildfire, was rolled over in white paint to clear space for advertising. It came back only because the neighborhood made enough noise that the building owner paid to pressure wash the paint off. "It's art over ads down here," the co-owner of Nevada Brew Works said at the time.

In August the city backed off an Arts District parking rate hike after the same thing happened.

The pattern holds. The art is the selling point until the moment it is in the way, and then it becomes a surface. Painted over for an ad. Regenerated for a leaflet. The neighborhood only gets it back by shouting.

The part they cannot explain away

A BID might genuinely be good for the Arts District. People who live and work there disagree about it in good faith, the assessments are real money, and it deserves a real argument at a real council hearing.

This is not that argument. This is a leaflet, addressed to artists, promising artists a stronger district, in which every picture of art is a fake. Given a neighborhood covered in murals made by people who are one phone call away, they generated imitations. Given one of their own future ratepayers' paintings, they let a model chew it up and printed the result under a heading about supporting creative businesses.

The painting was about being made sick by technology. They ran it through the technology. The cables came out, a drip went in, and it went to print as an argument for why these are the people who should be in charge of the art.

Quietly deleting the pictures is not the same as answering for them. The leaflet already went out. Whoever signed off on it is still asking for the money.

We make stencils for a living. Cut them by hand out of mylar, tape them to a wall, spray them, peel them back to paint bleeding and overspray. The whole reason that is worth doing is that a person stood there and did it. Same reason a mural is worth more than a picture of one. Nobody in the Arts District needs a machine to imagine what the walls could look like. Go outside and look at them.

Related reading from TasteBueno

0 comments

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.